Peacock Splendor—A Gallery of Regency Military Men

C3a6c7844469c0658b85d71301e58611Andrea here. Summer may be just starting here in the northern hemisphere, but the book calendar means that I’m already in “Autumn mode” for the upcoming release of my new Wrexford & Sloane mystery. MURDER AT THE SERPENTINE BRIDGE will hit the shelves on September 27 . . . By the by, my publishers is doing a Goodreads giveaway of 100 free ARC copies. Just click here by July 1 to enter for a chance to win! 


Murder at the Serpentine Bridge-smallOn my end, I, too, am starting to think about promo stuff. An introvert at heart, I would rather be writing the stories. But this book is particularly fun to talk about. There are times when an author get extraordinarily lucky and history provides a setting for a mystery more perfect than any author would dare to make up!

The actual Peace Celebrations which were held in London during June of 1814 play a leading role in the book’s plot. I’ll be talking more about the specific events in later blogs. Today, however, I’m musing about the pomp and splendor of the famous guests—especially the victorious military brass—who came from all over the Continent to celebrate the defeat of Napoleon (this is, the first defeat!) and his exile to the isle of Elba.

War is ugly and brutal, leaving a trail of death, desolation and destruction in its wake. So it’s a terrible irony that the painted portraits of themiitary involved in the interminable Napoleonic Wars have a certain heroic splendor (not to speak of a penchant for over-the-top bling!)

Charles stewart
What is it about about uniform festooned with a king’s ransom of gold braid and gaudy baubles that draws a fluttery sigh from the ladies? I confess, during the course of my research, I found myself pausing to admire the, er, eye candy.

Sir_Arthur_Wellesley _1st_Duke_of_Wellington
Horatio Nelson

Sir Sidney Smith

Joachim Murat
Auguste de Marmont

So, putting aside moral scruples to honor the superb artistry of the Regency painters, I thought I would share some of my favorite examples of Men in Uniform. (The Allied officers play some small cameo roles in my story! Enjoy the view!

Napoleon
Louis-Nicolas d'Avout

Alexander I

Jean-de-Dieu Soult
Sir_John_Moore_by_Sir_Thomas_Lawrence
From top to bottom: unidentified; Charles Stewart; Arthur Wellesley; Horatio Nelson; Sir Sidney Smith; Joachim Murat; Auguste de Marmot; Napoleon; Louis-Nicolas d'Avout; Tsar Alexander I; Jean-de-Dieu Soult; Sir John Moore.

So what about you? Does a man in uniform draw a fluttery sigh?

145 thoughts on “Peacock Splendor—A Gallery of Regency Military Men”

  1. I was in the army when I was young – many. many years ago, so I have an appreciation for medals and what it takes to earn them. Having said that, however, some of THESE uniforms just seem so over the top, that I find them comical. Maybe it’s my age (smile). But I do appreciate the portraits.
    Looking forward to hearing more about this book.

    Reply
  2. I was in the army when I was young – many. many years ago, so I have an appreciation for medals and what it takes to earn them. Having said that, however, some of THESE uniforms just seem so over the top, that I find them comical. Maybe it’s my age (smile). But I do appreciate the portraits.
    Looking forward to hearing more about this book.

    Reply
  3. I was in the army when I was young – many. many years ago, so I have an appreciation for medals and what it takes to earn them. Having said that, however, some of THESE uniforms just seem so over the top, that I find them comical. Maybe it’s my age (smile). But I do appreciate the portraits.
    Looking forward to hearing more about this book.

    Reply
  4. I was in the army when I was young – many. many years ago, so I have an appreciation for medals and what it takes to earn them. Having said that, however, some of THESE uniforms just seem so over the top, that I find them comical. Maybe it’s my age (smile). But I do appreciate the portraits.
    Looking forward to hearing more about this book.

    Reply
  5. I was in the army when I was young – many. many years ago, so I have an appreciation for medals and what it takes to earn them. Having said that, however, some of THESE uniforms just seem so over the top, that I find them comical. Maybe it’s my age (smile). But I do appreciate the portraits.
    Looking forward to hearing more about this book.

    Reply
  6. Yes, some of them really are too much. Admiral Nelson paid for his vanity—it’s said he received his mortal wound at the Battle of Trafalgar because all those gaudy medals caught the eye of a French sharpshooter, who took dead aim at him.
    I like the simple uniform f Sir John Moore, who is featured in my upcoming historical novel on Lady Hester Stanhope.By all accounts, he was a very admirable and modest man.

    Reply
  7. Yes, some of them really are too much. Admiral Nelson paid for his vanity—it’s said he received his mortal wound at the Battle of Trafalgar because all those gaudy medals caught the eye of a French sharpshooter, who took dead aim at him.
    I like the simple uniform f Sir John Moore, who is featured in my upcoming historical novel on Lady Hester Stanhope.By all accounts, he was a very admirable and modest man.

    Reply
  8. Yes, some of them really are too much. Admiral Nelson paid for his vanity—it’s said he received his mortal wound at the Battle of Trafalgar because all those gaudy medals caught the eye of a French sharpshooter, who took dead aim at him.
    I like the simple uniform f Sir John Moore, who is featured in my upcoming historical novel on Lady Hester Stanhope.By all accounts, he was a very admirable and modest man.

    Reply
  9. Yes, some of them really are too much. Admiral Nelson paid for his vanity—it’s said he received his mortal wound at the Battle of Trafalgar because all those gaudy medals caught the eye of a French sharpshooter, who took dead aim at him.
    I like the simple uniform f Sir John Moore, who is featured in my upcoming historical novel on Lady Hester Stanhope.By all accounts, he was a very admirable and modest man.

    Reply
  10. Yes, some of them really are too much. Admiral Nelson paid for his vanity—it’s said he received his mortal wound at the Battle of Trafalgar because all those gaudy medals caught the eye of a French sharpshooter, who took dead aim at him.
    I like the simple uniform f Sir John Moore, who is featured in my upcoming historical novel on Lady Hester Stanhope.By all accounts, he was a very admirable and modest man.

    Reply
  11. What handsome…portraits, Andrea; thank you for sharing them. Best wishes on the forthcoming release of the new Wrexford and Sloane mystery!

    Reply
  12. What handsome…portraits, Andrea; thank you for sharing them. Best wishes on the forthcoming release of the new Wrexford and Sloane mystery!

    Reply
  13. What handsome…portraits, Andrea; thank you for sharing them. Best wishes on the forthcoming release of the new Wrexford and Sloane mystery!

    Reply
  14. What handsome…portraits, Andrea; thank you for sharing them. Best wishes on the forthcoming release of the new Wrexford and Sloane mystery!

    Reply
  15. What handsome…portraits, Andrea; thank you for sharing them. Best wishes on the forthcoming release of the new Wrexford and Sloane mystery!

    Reply
  16. Of course the portraits may show the sitter in full-dress as opposed to what they would wear on the battlefield. At the battle of Waterloo Wellington wore a plain blue coat and General Picton who died in the same battle was in a black frock coat, top hat and carrying an umbrella.
    On the whole The uniforms of the British Army of that period are relatively plain especially compared to the French. New uniforms were issued in 1815 at the time of the occupation of Paris so that the British Army did not compare unfavourably with its continental allies. In Paris the Highlanders attracted a lot of attention from the ladies. My favourite uniform of the period is the dark green and black of the Rifle Corp.

    Reply
  17. Of course the portraits may show the sitter in full-dress as opposed to what they would wear on the battlefield. At the battle of Waterloo Wellington wore a plain blue coat and General Picton who died in the same battle was in a black frock coat, top hat and carrying an umbrella.
    On the whole The uniforms of the British Army of that period are relatively plain especially compared to the French. New uniforms were issued in 1815 at the time of the occupation of Paris so that the British Army did not compare unfavourably with its continental allies. In Paris the Highlanders attracted a lot of attention from the ladies. My favourite uniform of the period is the dark green and black of the Rifle Corp.

    Reply
  18. Of course the portraits may show the sitter in full-dress as opposed to what they would wear on the battlefield. At the battle of Waterloo Wellington wore a plain blue coat and General Picton who died in the same battle was in a black frock coat, top hat and carrying an umbrella.
    On the whole The uniforms of the British Army of that period are relatively plain especially compared to the French. New uniforms were issued in 1815 at the time of the occupation of Paris so that the British Army did not compare unfavourably with its continental allies. In Paris the Highlanders attracted a lot of attention from the ladies. My favourite uniform of the period is the dark green and black of the Rifle Corp.

    Reply
  19. Of course the portraits may show the sitter in full-dress as opposed to what they would wear on the battlefield. At the battle of Waterloo Wellington wore a plain blue coat and General Picton who died in the same battle was in a black frock coat, top hat and carrying an umbrella.
    On the whole The uniforms of the British Army of that period are relatively plain especially compared to the French. New uniforms were issued in 1815 at the time of the occupation of Paris so that the British Army did not compare unfavourably with its continental allies. In Paris the Highlanders attracted a lot of attention from the ladies. My favourite uniform of the period is the dark green and black of the Rifle Corp.

    Reply
  20. Of course the portraits may show the sitter in full-dress as opposed to what they would wear on the battlefield. At the battle of Waterloo Wellington wore a plain blue coat and General Picton who died in the same battle was in a black frock coat, top hat and carrying an umbrella.
    On the whole The uniforms of the British Army of that period are relatively plain especially compared to the French. New uniforms were issued in 1815 at the time of the occupation of Paris so that the British Army did not compare unfavourably with its continental allies. In Paris the Highlanders attracted a lot of attention from the ladies. My favourite uniform of the period is the dark green and black of the Rifle Corp.

    Reply
  21. There is certainly something about a man in uniform, even if it is just camos. Somehow the uniform implies discipline, strength, and ability. Looking at Wellesley’s portrait I can understand how he was such a babe magnet!

    Reply
  22. There is certainly something about a man in uniform, even if it is just camos. Somehow the uniform implies discipline, strength, and ability. Looking at Wellesley’s portrait I can understand how he was such a babe magnet!

    Reply
  23. There is certainly something about a man in uniform, even if it is just camos. Somehow the uniform implies discipline, strength, and ability. Looking at Wellesley’s portrait I can understand how he was such a babe magnet!

    Reply
  24. There is certainly something about a man in uniform, even if it is just camos. Somehow the uniform implies discipline, strength, and ability. Looking at Wellesley’s portrait I can understand how he was such a babe magnet!

    Reply
  25. There is certainly something about a man in uniform, even if it is just camos. Somehow the uniform implies discipline, strength, and ability. Looking at Wellesley’s portrait I can understand how he was such a babe magnet!

    Reply
  26. Very true, Stephen. These were the full dress uniforms usually worn for formal events/receptions. (Though Nelson was known to wear his bling into battle—a bad decision at Trafalgar!)
    Wellington was very understated in the field. I’ve seen one of his drab slate grey overcoats on display at the Guards Museum in London.Definitely not flashy.
    I agree with you—the dark green and black of the Rifle Corps uniforms is very very handsome.

    Reply
  27. Very true, Stephen. These were the full dress uniforms usually worn for formal events/receptions. (Though Nelson was known to wear his bling into battle—a bad decision at Trafalgar!)
    Wellington was very understated in the field. I’ve seen one of his drab slate grey overcoats on display at the Guards Museum in London.Definitely not flashy.
    I agree with you—the dark green and black of the Rifle Corps uniforms is very very handsome.

    Reply
  28. Very true, Stephen. These were the full dress uniforms usually worn for formal events/receptions. (Though Nelson was known to wear his bling into battle—a bad decision at Trafalgar!)
    Wellington was very understated in the field. I’ve seen one of his drab slate grey overcoats on display at the Guards Museum in London.Definitely not flashy.
    I agree with you—the dark green and black of the Rifle Corps uniforms is very very handsome.

    Reply
  29. Very true, Stephen. These were the full dress uniforms usually worn for formal events/receptions. (Though Nelson was known to wear his bling into battle—a bad decision at Trafalgar!)
    Wellington was very understated in the field. I’ve seen one of his drab slate grey overcoats on display at the Guards Museum in London.Definitely not flashy.
    I agree with you—the dark green and black of the Rifle Corps uniforms is very very handsome.

    Reply
  30. Very true, Stephen. These were the full dress uniforms usually worn for formal events/receptions. (Though Nelson was known to wear his bling into battle—a bad decision at Trafalgar!)
    Wellington was very understated in the field. I’ve seen one of his drab slate grey overcoats on display at the Guards Museum in London.Definitely not flashy.
    I agree with you—the dark green and black of the Rifle Corps uniforms is very very handsome.

    Reply
  31. Plus Wellington didn’t really care about the troops dress and pretty much disregarded such details. As Grattan of the 88th said: “Provided we brought our men into the field well appointed with their sixty rounds of ammunition each, he never looked to see whether trousers were black, blue, or grey: and as to ourselves, we might be rigged out in any colour of the rainbow if we fancied it.”
    As for the portraits my preference is for the simplicity of Sir John Moore. Wellington clearly dressed up a bit for his sitting but is still not over the top. Nelson of course is just being Nelson and one expects nothing else.

    Reply
  32. Plus Wellington didn’t really care about the troops dress and pretty much disregarded such details. As Grattan of the 88th said: “Provided we brought our men into the field well appointed with their sixty rounds of ammunition each, he never looked to see whether trousers were black, blue, or grey: and as to ourselves, we might be rigged out in any colour of the rainbow if we fancied it.”
    As for the portraits my preference is for the simplicity of Sir John Moore. Wellington clearly dressed up a bit for his sitting but is still not over the top. Nelson of course is just being Nelson and one expects nothing else.

    Reply
  33. Plus Wellington didn’t really care about the troops dress and pretty much disregarded such details. As Grattan of the 88th said: “Provided we brought our men into the field well appointed with their sixty rounds of ammunition each, he never looked to see whether trousers were black, blue, or grey: and as to ourselves, we might be rigged out in any colour of the rainbow if we fancied it.”
    As for the portraits my preference is for the simplicity of Sir John Moore. Wellington clearly dressed up a bit for his sitting but is still not over the top. Nelson of course is just being Nelson and one expects nothing else.

    Reply
  34. Plus Wellington didn’t really care about the troops dress and pretty much disregarded such details. As Grattan of the 88th said: “Provided we brought our men into the field well appointed with their sixty rounds of ammunition each, he never looked to see whether trousers were black, blue, or grey: and as to ourselves, we might be rigged out in any colour of the rainbow if we fancied it.”
    As for the portraits my preference is for the simplicity of Sir John Moore. Wellington clearly dressed up a bit for his sitting but is still not over the top. Nelson of course is just being Nelson and one expects nothing else.

    Reply
  35. Plus Wellington didn’t really care about the troops dress and pretty much disregarded such details. As Grattan of the 88th said: “Provided we brought our men into the field well appointed with their sixty rounds of ammunition each, he never looked to see whether trousers were black, blue, or grey: and as to ourselves, we might be rigged out in any colour of the rainbow if we fancied it.”
    As for the portraits my preference is for the simplicity of Sir John Moore. Wellington clearly dressed up a bit for his sitting but is still not over the top. Nelson of course is just being Nelson and one expects nothing else.

    Reply
  36. Andrea, I’m blinking against the dazzle! Seeing so much bling together is startling. *G* I’m another who particularly liked the portrait of Sir John Moore. He seems to have been admirable and sane and was much beloved by his troops.
    I’ve also seen that coat that Wellington wore in the Guards Museum–which I visited at your recommendation. It’s pretty awesome to think he actually wore that.

    Reply
  37. Andrea, I’m blinking against the dazzle! Seeing so much bling together is startling. *G* I’m another who particularly liked the portrait of Sir John Moore. He seems to have been admirable and sane and was much beloved by his troops.
    I’ve also seen that coat that Wellington wore in the Guards Museum–which I visited at your recommendation. It’s pretty awesome to think he actually wore that.

    Reply
  38. Andrea, I’m blinking against the dazzle! Seeing so much bling together is startling. *G* I’m another who particularly liked the portrait of Sir John Moore. He seems to have been admirable and sane and was much beloved by his troops.
    I’ve also seen that coat that Wellington wore in the Guards Museum–which I visited at your recommendation. It’s pretty awesome to think he actually wore that.

    Reply
  39. Andrea, I’m blinking against the dazzle! Seeing so much bling together is startling. *G* I’m another who particularly liked the portrait of Sir John Moore. He seems to have been admirable and sane and was much beloved by his troops.
    I’ve also seen that coat that Wellington wore in the Guards Museum–which I visited at your recommendation. It’s pretty awesome to think he actually wore that.

    Reply
  40. Andrea, I’m blinking against the dazzle! Seeing so much bling together is startling. *G* I’m another who particularly liked the portrait of Sir John Moore. He seems to have been admirable and sane and was much beloved by his troops.
    I’ve also seen that coat that Wellington wore in the Guards Museum–which I visited at your recommendation. It’s pretty awesome to think he actually wore that.

    Reply
  41. If Paul McCartney ever got the sulks, he’d look very like Soult 🙂
    I always find military portraits impressive. So many associations. Several times I’be bought a book because it had a gorgeous painting of a man in uniform on the cover.

    Reply
  42. If Paul McCartney ever got the sulks, he’d look very like Soult 🙂
    I always find military portraits impressive. So many associations. Several times I’be bought a book because it had a gorgeous painting of a man in uniform on the cover.

    Reply
  43. If Paul McCartney ever got the sulks, he’d look very like Soult 🙂
    I always find military portraits impressive. So many associations. Several times I’be bought a book because it had a gorgeous painting of a man in uniform on the cover.

    Reply
  44. If Paul McCartney ever got the sulks, he’d look very like Soult 🙂
    I always find military portraits impressive. So many associations. Several times I’be bought a book because it had a gorgeous painting of a man in uniform on the cover.

    Reply
  45. If Paul McCartney ever got the sulks, he’d look very like Soult 🙂
    I always find military portraits impressive. So many associations. Several times I’be bought a book because it had a gorgeous painting of a man in uniform on the cover.

    Reply
  46. Yes, I’m one of those whose heart flutters at a man in uniform. Crisp US Naval dress whites are nice. But I also like special forces uniforms, especially with all their cunning pockets. I particular enjoyed being at an historic baseball game where President Clinton was present. He was actually in the broadcast booth and called a home run. But even more exciting than play on the field were the guys on all the rooftops, decked out in many-pocketed black SWAT uniforms. Very hot.

    Reply
  47. Yes, I’m one of those whose heart flutters at a man in uniform. Crisp US Naval dress whites are nice. But I also like special forces uniforms, especially with all their cunning pockets. I particular enjoyed being at an historic baseball game where President Clinton was present. He was actually in the broadcast booth and called a home run. But even more exciting than play on the field were the guys on all the rooftops, decked out in many-pocketed black SWAT uniforms. Very hot.

    Reply
  48. Yes, I’m one of those whose heart flutters at a man in uniform. Crisp US Naval dress whites are nice. But I also like special forces uniforms, especially with all their cunning pockets. I particular enjoyed being at an historic baseball game where President Clinton was present. He was actually in the broadcast booth and called a home run. But even more exciting than play on the field were the guys on all the rooftops, decked out in many-pocketed black SWAT uniforms. Very hot.

    Reply
  49. Yes, I’m one of those whose heart flutters at a man in uniform. Crisp US Naval dress whites are nice. But I also like special forces uniforms, especially with all their cunning pockets. I particular enjoyed being at an historic baseball game where President Clinton was present. He was actually in the broadcast booth and called a home run. But even more exciting than play on the field were the guys on all the rooftops, decked out in many-pocketed black SWAT uniforms. Very hot.

    Reply
  50. Yes, I’m one of those whose heart flutters at a man in uniform. Crisp US Naval dress whites are nice. But I also like special forces uniforms, especially with all their cunning pockets. I particular enjoyed being at an historic baseball game where President Clinton was present. He was actually in the broadcast booth and called a home run. But even more exciting than play on the field were the guys on all the rooftops, decked out in many-pocketed black SWAT uniforms. Very hot.

    Reply
  51. I only recently discovered that Nelson and Wellington apparently only met once, coincidentally in a waiting room whilst each waiting to meet with Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War. I suppose it is not too surprising that an admiral and a general would have little opportunity to interact, but across the span of years such great figures seem too closely related to not have had a relationship.
    Nelson’s Trafalgar coat at the Greenwich museum was quite striking; found it just as the guards were about to chase us out at closing.

    Reply
  52. I only recently discovered that Nelson and Wellington apparently only met once, coincidentally in a waiting room whilst each waiting to meet with Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War. I suppose it is not too surprising that an admiral and a general would have little opportunity to interact, but across the span of years such great figures seem too closely related to not have had a relationship.
    Nelson’s Trafalgar coat at the Greenwich museum was quite striking; found it just as the guards were about to chase us out at closing.

    Reply
  53. I only recently discovered that Nelson and Wellington apparently only met once, coincidentally in a waiting room whilst each waiting to meet with Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War. I suppose it is not too surprising that an admiral and a general would have little opportunity to interact, but across the span of years such great figures seem too closely related to not have had a relationship.
    Nelson’s Trafalgar coat at the Greenwich museum was quite striking; found it just as the guards were about to chase us out at closing.

    Reply
  54. I only recently discovered that Nelson and Wellington apparently only met once, coincidentally in a waiting room whilst each waiting to meet with Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War. I suppose it is not too surprising that an admiral and a general would have little opportunity to interact, but across the span of years such great figures seem too closely related to not have had a relationship.
    Nelson’s Trafalgar coat at the Greenwich museum was quite striking; found it just as the guards were about to chase us out at closing.

    Reply
  55. I only recently discovered that Nelson and Wellington apparently only met once, coincidentally in a waiting room whilst each waiting to meet with Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War. I suppose it is not too surprising that an admiral and a general would have little opportunity to interact, but across the span of years such great figures seem too closely related to not have had a relationship.
    Nelson’s Trafalgar coat at the Greenwich museum was quite striking; found it just as the guards were about to chase us out at closing.

    Reply
  56. Oh my goodness, I thought that was just a dress uniform for ceremonial occasions, Nelson actually wore all those medals during battle?

    Reply
  57. Oh my goodness, I thought that was just a dress uniform for ceremonial occasions, Nelson actually wore all those medals during battle?

    Reply
  58. Oh my goodness, I thought that was just a dress uniform for ceremonial occasions, Nelson actually wore all those medals during battle?

    Reply
  59. Oh my goodness, I thought that was just a dress uniform for ceremonial occasions, Nelson actually wore all those medals during battle?

    Reply
  60. Oh my goodness, I thought that was just a dress uniform for ceremonial occasions, Nelson actually wore all those medals during battle?

    Reply
  61. I enjoy looking at the finery, but I don’t think clothes make the man. Thanks for the link to the giveaway, I am really looking forward to the book!

    Reply
  62. I enjoy looking at the finery, but I don’t think clothes make the man. Thanks for the link to the giveaway, I am really looking forward to the book!

    Reply
  63. I enjoy looking at the finery, but I don’t think clothes make the man. Thanks for the link to the giveaway, I am really looking forward to the book!

    Reply
  64. I enjoy looking at the finery, but I don’t think clothes make the man. Thanks for the link to the giveaway, I am really looking forward to the book!

    Reply
  65. I enjoy looking at the finery, but I don’t think clothes make the man. Thanks for the link to the giveaway, I am really looking forward to the book!

    Reply
  66. Quite a spectacle, isn’t it! In looking at all the various offciers, it really struck me that uniforms were the one excuse men of the era had to go a little wild with bling—and be admired for it! LOL.
    I added Sir John Moore because he was so understated. It fit his personality as such a modest yet great general. Such an admirable man. I’m looking forward to writing about him.

    Reply
  67. Quite a spectacle, isn’t it! In looking at all the various offciers, it really struck me that uniforms were the one excuse men of the era had to go a little wild with bling—and be admired for it! LOL.
    I added Sir John Moore because he was so understated. It fit his personality as such a modest yet great general. Such an admirable man. I’m looking forward to writing about him.

    Reply
  68. Quite a spectacle, isn’t it! In looking at all the various offciers, it really struck me that uniforms were the one excuse men of the era had to go a little wild with bling—and be admired for it! LOL.
    I added Sir John Moore because he was so understated. It fit his personality as such a modest yet great general. Such an admirable man. I’m looking forward to writing about him.

    Reply
  69. Quite a spectacle, isn’t it! In looking at all the various offciers, it really struck me that uniforms were the one excuse men of the era had to go a little wild with bling—and be admired for it! LOL.
    I added Sir John Moore because he was so understated. It fit his personality as such a modest yet great general. Such an admirable man. I’m looking forward to writing about him.

    Reply
  70. Quite a spectacle, isn’t it! In looking at all the various offciers, it really struck me that uniforms were the one excuse men of the era had to go a little wild with bling—and be admired for it! LOL.
    I added Sir John Moore because he was so understated. It fit his personality as such a modest yet great general. Such an admirable man. I’m looking forward to writing about him.

    Reply
  71. Wow, you go for the real action heroes, Binnie!
    The Special Forces uniforms really do have an impressive number of pockets! Their designers should focus on doing casual women’s wear, too—I mean, what woman would LOVE having so many handy places place to keep her stuff organized!

    Reply
  72. Wow, you go for the real action heroes, Binnie!
    The Special Forces uniforms really do have an impressive number of pockets! Their designers should focus on doing casual women’s wear, too—I mean, what woman would LOVE having so many handy places place to keep her stuff organized!

    Reply
  73. Wow, you go for the real action heroes, Binnie!
    The Special Forces uniforms really do have an impressive number of pockets! Their designers should focus on doing casual women’s wear, too—I mean, what woman would LOVE having so many handy places place to keep her stuff organized!

    Reply
  74. Wow, you go for the real action heroes, Binnie!
    The Special Forces uniforms really do have an impressive number of pockets! Their designers should focus on doing casual women’s wear, too—I mean, what woman would LOVE having so many handy places place to keep her stuff organized!

    Reply
  75. Wow, you go for the real action heroes, Binnie!
    The Special Forces uniforms really do have an impressive number of pockets! Their designers should focus on doing casual women’s wear, too—I mean, what woman would LOVE having so many handy places place to keep her stuff organized!

    Reply
  76. Yes, it’s interesting that Wellington and Nelson met at all—they really didn’t much opportunity to cross paths. I(I read that Wellington didn’t know who Nelson was at the time and asked who that like man who never stopped talking about himself!)
    I also saw Nelson’s coat at Greenwich—complete with the bullet hole! What struck me was how small he was. I’m not big, but I don’t I could have fit into it.

    Reply
  77. Yes, it’s interesting that Wellington and Nelson met at all—they really didn’t much opportunity to cross paths. I(I read that Wellington didn’t know who Nelson was at the time and asked who that like man who never stopped talking about himself!)
    I also saw Nelson’s coat at Greenwich—complete with the bullet hole! What struck me was how small he was. I’m not big, but I don’t I could have fit into it.

    Reply
  78. Yes, it’s interesting that Wellington and Nelson met at all—they really didn’t much opportunity to cross paths. I(I read that Wellington didn’t know who Nelson was at the time and asked who that like man who never stopped talking about himself!)
    I also saw Nelson’s coat at Greenwich—complete with the bullet hole! What struck me was how small he was. I’m not big, but I don’t I could have fit into it.

    Reply
  79. Yes, it’s interesting that Wellington and Nelson met at all—they really didn’t much opportunity to cross paths. I(I read that Wellington didn’t know who Nelson was at the time and asked who that like man who never stopped talking about himself!)
    I also saw Nelson’s coat at Greenwich—complete with the bullet hole! What struck me was how small he was. I’m not big, but I don’t I could have fit into it.

    Reply
  80. Yes, it’s interesting that Wellington and Nelson met at all—they really didn’t much opportunity to cross paths. I(I read that Wellington didn’t know who Nelson was at the time and asked who that like man who never stopped talking about himself!)
    I also saw Nelson’s coat at Greenwich—complete with the bullet hole! What struck me was how small he was. I’m not big, but I don’t I could have fit into it.

    Reply
  81. My favorite portrait of my father is of him in his uniform. I married a man in the army but American uniforms aren’t as dazzling. The dress blues were worn seldom. I am rather partial to a man in uniform on book covers of Regency Romances. One of my favorite officers without even seeing him is Mary Jo’s Will in Once a Solider and other books. I have a set back of a cover of a soldier along with pictures of my husband and Lord Byron that I can imagine is Lord Masterdon or other intriguing officers. I much prefer a man in uniform to a man with an anachronistic shirt half off his chest on a book cover.

    Reply
  82. My favorite portrait of my father is of him in his uniform. I married a man in the army but American uniforms aren’t as dazzling. The dress blues were worn seldom. I am rather partial to a man in uniform on book covers of Regency Romances. One of my favorite officers without even seeing him is Mary Jo’s Will in Once a Solider and other books. I have a set back of a cover of a soldier along with pictures of my husband and Lord Byron that I can imagine is Lord Masterdon or other intriguing officers. I much prefer a man in uniform to a man with an anachronistic shirt half off his chest on a book cover.

    Reply
  83. My favorite portrait of my father is of him in his uniform. I married a man in the army but American uniforms aren’t as dazzling. The dress blues were worn seldom. I am rather partial to a man in uniform on book covers of Regency Romances. One of my favorite officers without even seeing him is Mary Jo’s Will in Once a Solider and other books. I have a set back of a cover of a soldier along with pictures of my husband and Lord Byron that I can imagine is Lord Masterdon or other intriguing officers. I much prefer a man in uniform to a man with an anachronistic shirt half off his chest on a book cover.

    Reply
  84. My favorite portrait of my father is of him in his uniform. I married a man in the army but American uniforms aren’t as dazzling. The dress blues were worn seldom. I am rather partial to a man in uniform on book covers of Regency Romances. One of my favorite officers without even seeing him is Mary Jo’s Will in Once a Solider and other books. I have a set back of a cover of a soldier along with pictures of my husband and Lord Byron that I can imagine is Lord Masterdon or other intriguing officers. I much prefer a man in uniform to a man with an anachronistic shirt half off his chest on a book cover.

    Reply
  85. My favorite portrait of my father is of him in his uniform. I married a man in the army but American uniforms aren’t as dazzling. The dress blues were worn seldom. I am rather partial to a man in uniform on book covers of Regency Romances. One of my favorite officers without even seeing him is Mary Jo’s Will in Once a Solider and other books. I have a set back of a cover of a soldier along with pictures of my husband and Lord Byron that I can imagine is Lord Masterdon or other intriguing officers. I much prefer a man in uniform to a man with an anachronistic shirt half off his chest on a book cover.

    Reply
  86. I wonder if they all sat around the campfire and compared their geegaws? (that is a country term from East Texas) Thanks for the post and the portraits. You know I realize it is disrespectful, but I believe they all took themselves much too seriously.
    I have been dazzled by uniforms and the men within them. But, not a one of them were this fancy.
    Thanks again for the post and pictures.
    Hope y’all are all doing well.

    Reply
  87. I wonder if they all sat around the campfire and compared their geegaws? (that is a country term from East Texas) Thanks for the post and the portraits. You know I realize it is disrespectful, but I believe they all took themselves much too seriously.
    I have been dazzled by uniforms and the men within them. But, not a one of them were this fancy.
    Thanks again for the post and pictures.
    Hope y’all are all doing well.

    Reply
  88. I wonder if they all sat around the campfire and compared their geegaws? (that is a country term from East Texas) Thanks for the post and the portraits. You know I realize it is disrespectful, but I believe they all took themselves much too seriously.
    I have been dazzled by uniforms and the men within them. But, not a one of them were this fancy.
    Thanks again for the post and pictures.
    Hope y’all are all doing well.

    Reply
  89. I wonder if they all sat around the campfire and compared their geegaws? (that is a country term from East Texas) Thanks for the post and the portraits. You know I realize it is disrespectful, but I believe they all took themselves much too seriously.
    I have been dazzled by uniforms and the men within them. But, not a one of them were this fancy.
    Thanks again for the post and pictures.
    Hope y’all are all doing well.

    Reply
  90. I wonder if they all sat around the campfire and compared their geegaws? (that is a country term from East Texas) Thanks for the post and the portraits. You know I realize it is disrespectful, but I believe they all took themselves much too seriously.
    I have been dazzled by uniforms and the men within them. But, not a one of them were this fancy.
    Thanks again for the post and pictures.
    Hope y’all are all doing well.

    Reply
  91. American uniforms have never been very dazzling, Nancy. They do tend to be utilitarian.
    Mary Jo’s hero in Once A Soldier was definitely cover-worthy! (I imagine him in the same very understated uniform of Sir John Moore.) I totally agree that regimentals are much more appealing on a Regency cover than an anachronistic shirt.

    Reply
  92. American uniforms have never been very dazzling, Nancy. They do tend to be utilitarian.
    Mary Jo’s hero in Once A Soldier was definitely cover-worthy! (I imagine him in the same very understated uniform of Sir John Moore.) I totally agree that regimentals are much more appealing on a Regency cover than an anachronistic shirt.

    Reply
  93. American uniforms have never been very dazzling, Nancy. They do tend to be utilitarian.
    Mary Jo’s hero in Once A Soldier was definitely cover-worthy! (I imagine him in the same very understated uniform of Sir John Moore.) I totally agree that regimentals are much more appealing on a Regency cover than an anachronistic shirt.

    Reply
  94. American uniforms have never been very dazzling, Nancy. They do tend to be utilitarian.
    Mary Jo’s hero in Once A Soldier was definitely cover-worthy! (I imagine him in the same very understated uniform of Sir John Moore.) I totally agree that regimentals are much more appealing on a Regency cover than an anachronistic shirt.

    Reply
  95. American uniforms have never been very dazzling, Nancy. They do tend to be utilitarian.
    Mary Jo’s hero in Once A Soldier was definitely cover-worthy! (I imagine him in the same very understated uniform of Sir John Moore.) I totally agree that regimentals are much more appealing on a Regency cover than an anachronistic shirt.

    Reply
  96. Annette, I agree that some of these dress uniforms are very self-important and make them appear very vain and pompous. On an artistic level, though, the geegaws are fun to look at.(We have that word in New England, too!)
    Glad you enjoyed the post.

    Reply
  97. Annette, I agree that some of these dress uniforms are very self-important and make them appear very vain and pompous. On an artistic level, though, the geegaws are fun to look at.(We have that word in New England, too!)
    Glad you enjoyed the post.

    Reply
  98. Annette, I agree that some of these dress uniforms are very self-important and make them appear very vain and pompous. On an artistic level, though, the geegaws are fun to look at.(We have that word in New England, too!)
    Glad you enjoyed the post.

    Reply
  99. Annette, I agree that some of these dress uniforms are very self-important and make them appear very vain and pompous. On an artistic level, though, the geegaws are fun to look at.(We have that word in New England, too!)
    Glad you enjoyed the post.

    Reply
  100. Annette, I agree that some of these dress uniforms are very self-important and make them appear very vain and pompous. On an artistic level, though, the geegaws are fun to look at.(We have that word in New England, too!)
    Glad you enjoyed the post.

    Reply
  101. Thanks for the link on the giveaway Andrea. Definitely used that! I love all the pictures and I do find a man in uniform so attractive. Hmmm… guess I’ll just look through these again.

    Reply
  102. Thanks for the link on the giveaway Andrea. Definitely used that! I love all the pictures and I do find a man in uniform so attractive. Hmmm… guess I’ll just look through these again.

    Reply
  103. Thanks for the link on the giveaway Andrea. Definitely used that! I love all the pictures and I do find a man in uniform so attractive. Hmmm… guess I’ll just look through these again.

    Reply
  104. Thanks for the link on the giveaway Andrea. Definitely used that! I love all the pictures and I do find a man in uniform so attractive. Hmmm… guess I’ll just look through these again.

    Reply
  105. Thanks for the link on the giveaway Andrea. Definitely used that! I love all the pictures and I do find a man in uniform so attractive. Hmmm… guess I’ll just look through these again.

    Reply
  106. I think it was actually the other way round: Wellington could not fail to recognise the national hero (it was 1805, plus those missing body parts) but Nelson had no idea who this general was.
    The story he told to Croker many years later runs thusly: “He could not know who I was, but he entered at once into conversation with me, if I can call it conversation, for it was almost all on his side, and all about himself, and in really a style so vain and so silly as to surprise and almost disgust me. I suppose something that I happened to say may have made him guess that I was somebody, and he went out of the room for a moment, I have no doubt to ask the office-keeper who I was, for when he came back he was altogether a different man, both in manner and matter. All that I had thought a charlatan style had vanished, and he talked of the state of this country and of the aspect and probabilities of affairs on the Continent with a good sense, and a knowledge of subjects both at home and abroad that surprised me equally and more agreeably than the first part of our interview had done; in fact, he talked like an officer and a statesman.”
    Given that Wellington had only just retuned after years in India and that Nelson would be dead within a month, your comment on their limited opportunity to cross paths is very much true.

    Reply
  107. I think it was actually the other way round: Wellington could not fail to recognise the national hero (it was 1805, plus those missing body parts) but Nelson had no idea who this general was.
    The story he told to Croker many years later runs thusly: “He could not know who I was, but he entered at once into conversation with me, if I can call it conversation, for it was almost all on his side, and all about himself, and in really a style so vain and so silly as to surprise and almost disgust me. I suppose something that I happened to say may have made him guess that I was somebody, and he went out of the room for a moment, I have no doubt to ask the office-keeper who I was, for when he came back he was altogether a different man, both in manner and matter. All that I had thought a charlatan style had vanished, and he talked of the state of this country and of the aspect and probabilities of affairs on the Continent with a good sense, and a knowledge of subjects both at home and abroad that surprised me equally and more agreeably than the first part of our interview had done; in fact, he talked like an officer and a statesman.”
    Given that Wellington had only just retuned after years in India and that Nelson would be dead within a month, your comment on their limited opportunity to cross paths is very much true.

    Reply
  108. I think it was actually the other way round: Wellington could not fail to recognise the national hero (it was 1805, plus those missing body parts) but Nelson had no idea who this general was.
    The story he told to Croker many years later runs thusly: “He could not know who I was, but he entered at once into conversation with me, if I can call it conversation, for it was almost all on his side, and all about himself, and in really a style so vain and so silly as to surprise and almost disgust me. I suppose something that I happened to say may have made him guess that I was somebody, and he went out of the room for a moment, I have no doubt to ask the office-keeper who I was, for when he came back he was altogether a different man, both in manner and matter. All that I had thought a charlatan style had vanished, and he talked of the state of this country and of the aspect and probabilities of affairs on the Continent with a good sense, and a knowledge of subjects both at home and abroad that surprised me equally and more agreeably than the first part of our interview had done; in fact, he talked like an officer and a statesman.”
    Given that Wellington had only just retuned after years in India and that Nelson would be dead within a month, your comment on their limited opportunity to cross paths is very much true.

    Reply
  109. I think it was actually the other way round: Wellington could not fail to recognise the national hero (it was 1805, plus those missing body parts) but Nelson had no idea who this general was.
    The story he told to Croker many years later runs thusly: “He could not know who I was, but he entered at once into conversation with me, if I can call it conversation, for it was almost all on his side, and all about himself, and in really a style so vain and so silly as to surprise and almost disgust me. I suppose something that I happened to say may have made him guess that I was somebody, and he went out of the room for a moment, I have no doubt to ask the office-keeper who I was, for when he came back he was altogether a different man, both in manner and matter. All that I had thought a charlatan style had vanished, and he talked of the state of this country and of the aspect and probabilities of affairs on the Continent with a good sense, and a knowledge of subjects both at home and abroad that surprised me equally and more agreeably than the first part of our interview had done; in fact, he talked like an officer and a statesman.”
    Given that Wellington had only just retuned after years in India and that Nelson would be dead within a month, your comment on their limited opportunity to cross paths is very much true.

    Reply
  110. I think it was actually the other way round: Wellington could not fail to recognise the national hero (it was 1805, plus those missing body parts) but Nelson had no idea who this general was.
    The story he told to Croker many years later runs thusly: “He could not know who I was, but he entered at once into conversation with me, if I can call it conversation, for it was almost all on his side, and all about himself, and in really a style so vain and so silly as to surprise and almost disgust me. I suppose something that I happened to say may have made him guess that I was somebody, and he went out of the room for a moment, I have no doubt to ask the office-keeper who I was, for when he came back he was altogether a different man, both in manner and matter. All that I had thought a charlatan style had vanished, and he talked of the state of this country and of the aspect and probabilities of affairs on the Continent with a good sense, and a knowledge of subjects both at home and abroad that surprised me equally and more agreeably than the first part of our interview had done; in fact, he talked like an officer and a statesman.”
    Given that Wellington had only just retuned after years in India and that Nelson would be dead within a month, your comment on their limited opportunity to cross paths is very much true.

    Reply
  111. Ask him any Questions about herpes
    […] It’s a crazy miracle product. Read my review here. […] 💪🏻❤️
    I was cured of herpes simplex virus his contact ___________hsv1.herpes @gmail. com…………………..
    this is the best herbal remedy…

    Reply
  112. Ask him any Questions about herpes
    […] It’s a crazy miracle product. Read my review here. […] 💪🏻❤️
    I was cured of herpes simplex virus his contact ___________hsv1.herpes @gmail. com…………………..
    this is the best herbal remedy…

    Reply
  113. Ask him any Questions about herpes
    […] It’s a crazy miracle product. Read my review here. […] 💪🏻❤️
    I was cured of herpes simplex virus his contact ___________hsv1.herpes @gmail. com…………………..
    this is the best herbal remedy…

    Reply
  114. Ask him any Questions about herpes
    […] It’s a crazy miracle product. Read my review here. […] 💪🏻❤️
    I was cured of herpes simplex virus his contact ___________hsv1.herpes @gmail. com…………………..
    this is the best herbal remedy…

    Reply
  115. Ask him any Questions about herpes
    […] It’s a crazy miracle product. Read my review here. […] 💪🏻❤️
    I was cured of herpes simplex virus his contact ___________hsv1.herpes @gmail. com…………………..
    this is the best herbal remedy…

    Reply

Leave a Comment